This book revives to issues of jury ethics by collecting new and insightful essays along with responses from leading scholars in the field of jury studies.

Chapter 1 Introduction: Ethical Foundations of the American Criminal Jury, John Kleinig, James P. Levine; Chapter 2 Ethical Reciprocity: The Obligations of Citizens and Courts to Promote Participation in Jury Service, Paula L. Hannaford-Agor, G. Thomas Munsterman; An Ethical Framework for Jury Selection: Enhancing Voir Dire Conditions, Julie E. Howe; Chapter 3 Jurors' Duties, Obligations, and Rights: The Ethical/Moral Roots of Discretion, Norman J. Finkel; Who's the We? Toward a Framework for Understanding and Evaluating Critiques of the American Jury, Adina Schwartz; Chapter 4 The Constitutional and Ethical Implications of "Must-Find-the-Defendant-Guilty" Jury Instructions, B. Michael Dann; When Ethics and Empirics Are Entwined: A Response to Judge Dann's Nullification Proposals, Shari Seidman Diamond; Chapter 5 Mercy and Morals: The Ethics of Nullification, Alan W. Scheflin; The Truth of Nullification: A Response to Professor Scheflin, Candace McCoy; Chapter 6 Jury Deliberation: Fair and Foul, Jeffrey Abramson; The Ethics of Jury Room Politics: A Response to Jeffrey Abramson, James P. Levine; Chapter 7 Ethics for the Ex-Juror: Guiding Former Jurors after the Trial, Nancy J. King; When Jurors Talk about Their Verdict, Neil Vidmar; Chapter 8 Jury Research Ethics and the Integrity of Jury Deliberations, Valerie P. Hans; What Price Knowledge? A Response to Professor Hans's Inquiry into the Ethics of Invading the Sanctity of the Jury Room, Maureen O'Connor;