Political Control of America’s Courts

Examining the Facts
 HC gerader Rücken kaschiert

104,63 €*

Alle Preise inkl. MwSt.|Versandkostenfrei
ISBN-13:
9781440878053
Veröffentl:
2023
Einband:
HC gerader Rücken kaschiert
Erscheinungsdatum:
31.01.2023
Seiten:
226
Autor:
Helena Silverstein
Gewicht:
510 g
Format:
240x161x17 mm
Sprache:
Englisch
Beschreibung:

This volume explores the many ways in which politics shapes the allegedly nonpartisan judicial system in America, ranging from how judges are selected to the bench to how they rule when they get there.Each title in the Contemporary Debates series examines the veracity of controversial claims or beliefs surrounding a major political/cultural issue in the United States. Each book gives readers a clear and unbiased understanding of current high-interest issues by informing them about falsehoods, half-truths, and misconceptions-and confirming the factual validity of other assertions-that have gained traction in America's cultural and political discourse.This volume in the series provides a deeply researched and even-handed account of the relationship between America's judicial branch-which is supposed to view law through a nonpartisan lens-and the sometimes poisonous partisanship that is such a notorious factor in the nation's other two branches of government. Is political combat over judicial nominations worse than ever before? What impact is the politicization of the courts having on public faith in the legitimacy of the courts and our wider political system? Was former Supreme Court justice Sandra Day right when she asserted that "judicial independence is a bedrock principle of our court system, and we are losing it"? This work will provide insights into all these questions and more.
Provides valuable insights and information on judicial reform efforts
AcknowledgmentsHow to Use This Book1. Nominations, Confirmations, and Departures of Federal JudgesQ1. Are nominations and confirmations to the federal bench based on factors beyond merit?Q2. Do outside organizations influence whom the president nominates to the federal bench?Q3. Do interest groups influence the Supreme Court confirmation process?Q4. Is it unusual for the Senate to reject a Supreme Court nominee?Q5. Was the Senate's refusal to take action on President Obama's Supreme Court nomination of Merrick Garland really unprecedented?Q6. Are Supreme Court confirmation hearings a "vapid and hollow charade"?Q7. Is the timing of judicial retirements from the Supreme Court influenced by politics?Q8. Did President Trump's judicial appointments fundamentally re-make the federal judiciary for decades to come?2. Judicial Elections to State CourtsQ9. Have contested judicial elections become more political over recent decades?Q10. Are nonpartisan judicial elections less political than partisan judicial elections?Q11. Has politicization of judicial retention elections increased?Q12. Does the growth of campaign spending by interest groups affect judicial independence?Q13. Do politicized judicial elections threaten the legitimacy of state courts?3. Structures Affecting the CourtsQ14. Has Congress or the president ever sought to adjust the size of the Supreme Court for political gain?Q15. Can Congress strip the Supreme Court and lower federal courts of their jurisdiction?Q16. Would term limits make the Supreme Court less politicized?Q17. Was the end of the filibuster in federal judicial confirmations a historic rule change?Q18. Is the end of the filibuster in federal judicial confirmations likely to increase polarization onthe federal courts?4. Decisions and Decision MakingQ19. Are Supreme Court justices influenced by public opinion?Q20. Do judges' political attitudes and ideologies influence their legal decisions?Q21. Did the Supreme Court's "switch in time that saved nine" occur in direct response to external political pressure?Q22. Is the influence of amicus briefs on the Supreme Court growing?Q23. Is the Supreme Court using the "shadow docket" more frequently?5. Public Perceptions of the JudiciaryQ24. Is public faith and confidence in the Supreme Court in decline?Q25. Does the public believe the courts are political and partisan?Q26. Does the public's perception of the judiciary vary by party affiliation?Q27. Has the judicial philosophy known as "originalism" become dominant in American jurisprudence and accepted by the public?6. Politicization, Partisanship, and LegitimacyQ28. Were President Trump's criticisms of the judiciary unusual?Q29. Has the Supreme Court become more partisan?Q30. Is the Supreme Court facing a legitimacy crisis?Subject IndexAbout the Author

Kunden Rezensionen

Zu diesem Artikel ist noch keine Rezension vorhanden.
Helfen sie anderen Besuchern und verfassen Sie selbst eine Rezension.

Google Plus
Powered by Inooga