Non-philosophy is neither a school nor a method, and it is not simply another way of doing philosophy by other means. Mullarkey and Smith demonstrate this in their selection of essays for this volume; each essay refuses the traditional explanatory or representational functions of philosophy, preferring to see thought as co-extensive with a real in which it is imbricated. A welcome addition to the growing engagement with Laruelle and non-philosophy.

Introduction: The Non-Philosophical Inversion: Laruelle's Knowledge Without Domination; John Mullarkey and Anthony Paul Smith; 1. Thinking from the One: Science and the Ancient Philosophical Figure of the One, Anthony Paul Smith; 2. Laruelle Facing Deleuze: Immanence, Resistance and Desire, Marjorie Gracieuse; 3. Laruelle and Ordinary Life, Rocco Gangle; 4. The Justice of Non-Philosophy, Joshua Ramey; 5. Laruelle and the Reality of Abstraction, Ray Brassier; 6. The Science-Thought of Laruelle and Its Effects on Epistemology, Anne-Françoise Schmid; 7. 1 + 1 = 1: The Non-Consistency of Non-Philosophical Practice (Photo: Quantum: Fractal), John Mullarkey; 8. Transcendental Arguments, Axiomatic Truth, and the Difficulty of Overcoming Idealism, Michael J. Olson; 9. Laruelle, Anti-Capitalist, Alexander R. Galloway; 10. Theories of the Immanent Rebellion: Non-Marxism and Non-Christianity, Katerina Kolozova; 11. Is Thinking Democratic? Or, How to Introduce Theory into Democracy, François Laruelle; 12. Non-Philosophy, Weapon of Last Defence: An Interview with François Laruelle; Notes on Contributors; Bibliography; Index.